ClinicOps
Regulatory intelligence

EU medical device regulatory intelligence

Regulatory intelligence is not a feed of alerts, and it is not a compliance verdict. It is the discipline of turning scattered public and internal signals into evidence a regulatory team can act on, with actor-role and duty-holder context intact.

ClinicOps applies machine breadth to find and classify signals and bounded human review to decide what they mean. RA/QA and the manufacturer retain regulatory decisions.

More signal is not the problem

Portfolio teams can already see EUDAMED records, certificate timing, Basic UDI-DI information, SS(C)P material and market-language documents. The harder problem is reconciling those inputs, keeping who is responsible for each attached, and deciding what needs human review first.

Without that discipline, screening either overreaches into unsupported allegations or buries the real questions in noise.

Machine breadth. Human judgement. Evidence that survives review.

  1. Capture the signal — collect public and supplied inputs across the bounded scope.
  2. Classify the evidence — separate screening signals, observations, source facts and unresolved questions from conclusions.
  3. Preserve actor-role and duty-holder context — keep manufacturer, authorised representative, importer and other relevant roles attached to the evidence.
  4. Block unsupported claims — never convert a missing field or structural signal into a compliance allegation.
  5. Prioritise the work — order the portfolio by what needs human review first.
  6. Deliver a reviewable action plan — hand RA/QA a queue with provenance and explicit uncertainty, not a verdict.

Duty-holder context matters

Under MDR Article 32, the manufacturer is the duty holder for drawing up the SS(C)P for applicable implantable and class III devices, subject to the Article 32 exclusions. ClinicOps keeps that context attached instead of flattening the work into generic document checking.

Public-register screening is an input, not a determination

Public-register screening is an evidence input, not a compliance determination or a claim of full-register coverage. A B-prefixed EUDAMED DI signal, for example, is useful for structural screening but does not by itself establish a device's full regulatory or SS(C)P state.

Where the method applies

What ClinicOps does not promise

Start with one bounded problem

Send one bounded question with the evidence you already hold, or talk through the workflow first. ClinicOps shows what can be screened reproducibly, what is missing and where regulatory judgement is needed.