A discrepancy register should show the evidence chain—not just the red flags.
Explore a fictional ClinicOps review output. Each row keeps the approved reference, observation, evidence basis, machine signal, owner and human decision separate so a reviewer can see what is known, what is inferred and what still needs authority.
Explore the register
Filter the synthetic findings, then select any row to inspect its evidence chain and decision boundary.
| ID | Field | Reference | Observed surface | Observed | Signal | Owner / decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F-01 | IFU revision | IFU-12 | EUDAMED export | IFU-11 | DIFFERENT | Regulatory Affairs · review open |
| F-02 | Manufacturer name | Example MedTech GmbH | SS(C)P | Example MedTech GmbH | MATCH | Evidence preserved · no discrepancy action |
| F-03 | Storage upper limit | 25 °C / 30 °C conflict | Label artwork | 25 °C | UNRESOLVED | RA/QA owner · authority decision required |
| F-04 | Basic UDI-DI | BUDI-ALPHA-001 | Distributor master | BUDI-ALPHA-01 | DIFFERENT | Master Data · correction candidate |
| F-05 | Sterile status | Sterile EO | ERP product text | Sterile | CLOSED | QA decision · wording accepted in context |
| F-06 | Contraindication phrase | Reference phrase v4 | Local IFU | Reference phrase v3 | DIFFERENT | Medical / RA review · propagation check |
What makes the register evidence-first
Example evidence chain
ClinicOps can automate the structure and comparison. The accountable client role retains source-authority and release decisions.
From free check to controlled review
The browser-local integrity check produces one portable evidence packet. A real review extends that pattern across an agreed population of fields, sources and downstream surfaces with preserved source references, exception routing and a named reviewer.
Need the earlier static artifact? Open archived PDF specimen v1.5. The interactive page above is the current specimen experience.